CONSTITUTIONALISM 3.0

WELCOME TO CONSTITUTIONALISM 3.0

Mr . Fali Nariman – “The judge’s role when interpreting the Constitution is like that of an artist drawing a picture: the frame of the picture and the artist’s tools must always be drawn from the text of the Constitution, its structure and the country’s history, but there must also be some measure of the artist’s own vision and understanding. ”

Latest from the Blog

Law of Privacy in Foreign Jurisdictions

Author – Raj Krishna The Supreme Court of India in the case of K.S. Puttaswamy v Union of India observed that every Indian citizen has a right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution. For arriving at this conclusion they relied upon a lot of foreign laws. Some of them have been discussed below

January 18, 2021

PRIVACY AND LAW OF EVIDENCE

Author- Kumar Mukul Choudhary. An important facet of privacy is criminal procedure and relevancy of evidence. Although the Supreme Court has not dealt with any such issue yet, but recently Bombay High Court has pronounced a verdict on this point of law.[1] The case involved illegal phone tapping of a business man. Although this case

January 4, 2021January 4, 2021

DECRIMINALIZATION OF ADULTERY LAW: A STEP IN A RIGHT DIRECTION

This blog was first published here. Authors: – Raj Krishna and Teresa Dhar. 1. INTRODUCTION On 27th September 2018 the Apex Court of India unanimously struck down the 158-year old penal provision criminalizing adultery as unconstitutional. Section 497 of Indian Penal Code criminalized a man having consensual sexual intercourse with a married woman without the

December 20, 2020December 20, 2020

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.